The Mike Henry Interview
Interview Conducted by Paul Bax


When and how did you first start your training in martial arts?
Mike Henry:
I started my training the moment I stepped through the gym doors at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). The Wu-Wei class was being taught by Joseph Cowles with Joe Purcell assisting. It was my first exposure to any type of martial arts training.

How did you first hear about Bruce Lee and his art of Jeet Kune Do?
MH: I did not hear about Jeet Kune Do until much later in my training, but I did hear something about Bruce Lee before my training began. I really did not know who he was, just that he was supposed to be good at martial arts.

What was it about JKD that led you away from traditional martial arts?
MH: Since Wu-Wei was my first martial art, it was Wu-Wei that allowed me to experiment with other martial arts, both traditional and non-traditional. I try to be as open minded as possible.

JKD has gone through a lot of phases over the years due to different theories on how the art should be taught. Were you ever a student of "JKD Concepts"?
MH: I studied the concepts that Joseph Cowles taught in Wu-Wei Gung Fu. Most were the same as JKD Concepts that I would later learn through JKD books, videos, and seminars by Tim Tackett, Larry Hartsell, Dan Inosanto, and others.

You are a student of Joe Cowles. How did you two meet?
MH: We met my first day in Wu-Wei class. I had wanted to take a martial arts course ever since I was a teenager. When I was 22 years old I found a UTA Continuing Education catalog which gave a short description of Wu-Wei and mentioned Bruce Lee. As I mentioned before, I had no idea who Bruce Lee was, just that he was supposed to be good. So I said to myself, “If it’s good enough for Bruce Lee then it’s good enough for me.”

How long did your physical training last with him?
MH: I trained with Sifu Cowles from 1983 until he left Texas in 1987.

Describe your training under him.
MH: Training was always ardent. We would enter class dry and leave totally soaked with sweat. The first training classes would leave me physically and mentally exhausted. Even much later when I would train at Sifu Cowles house he would push us to our physical limits, but more importantly, to and past our mental limitations. For instance, one time Sifu Cowles held the Thai pads for what seemed to be an intolerable amount of time while I attempted to kick the pads as hard as I could. When I stopped to catch my breath Sifu would stand there waiting. He wouldn’t say anything. No words of encouragement. He just stood there prepared to absorb my next kick as if it was going to my most powerful kick ever. You could just see it in his eyes and you just had to gather whatever you had left in you and kick until he said stop.

How is Joe Cowles Wu Wei different then what you have experienced from Lee's other students?
MH: I think the biggest difference is the organization or classification of Bruce’s techniques, concepts, and philosophy. It seems to me Bruce, while in Seattle, was just beginning to visualize what Jun Fan Gung Fu was and what he wanted it to become.

How has your friendship with Joe Cowles affected your life?
MH: Sifu Cowles has been more than just a martial arts instructor to me. Being a Toe-Dai (“Closed-Door student”) has meant Sifu has been like a Father figure to me and, at times, has provided me with spiritual guidance.

What do you think is the biggest misconception that people have about Bruce Lee's art?
MH: To those that have never studied a martial art, it is just like Karate. To those that have studied other martial arts, it is a hodgepodge of many martial art styles mixed together with no real substance.

A lot of emphasis has been put on who Bruce Lee actually certified and what he certified them in. Your thoughts?
MH: I guess certification is more important now than it was back then. I think Linda Lee Cadwell said it best when she said something about Bruce teaching more than just techniques. What I mean is, Bruce was friends with many people and taught many people martial arts. Everyone who met Bruce had to learn something and most likely something very profound. The thing is to be open and to learn about yourself. Learn what works and what doesn’t work for you at the moment.

How has Bruce Lee's philosophy affected you?
MH: His philosophy has enhanced my studies of the psychology of man. Being a person who generally does not like confrontations, Bruce’s philosophy of fighting without fighting fits right in. When I was a kid, “Having no limitation as limitation” may have been easier to imagine. It is interesting how I find myself or others limiting what we do or can do. But I think Bruce’s philosophy of being water is the most impressive. I feel being a simplifier helps to achieve a lot of what Bruce philosophized about.

Do you think “The Tao of Jeet Kune Do” is a good representation of Lee's art?
MH: Yes, from an extremely high level and from a specific time in Bruce’s life. I feel “The Tao of Jeet Kune Do” has many of the puzzle pieces that Bruce knew at the time of its writing and given the constraints he was under at the time. Although the “Tao” has many of the puzzle pieces it does not necessarily describe how they fit together and more importantly, how they fit together when it fits the moment. I’m sure this would be difficult to communicate in a book. I would think nothing short of actually training with Bruce would allow anyone to gain a “good” representation of his art.

What bothers you most about the JKD or Bruce Lee community?
MH: Politics.

Dan Inosanto has been ridiculed over the years for his somewhat abstract way to teach Jeet Kune Do. Your thoughts?
MH: All I can say is I have attended only a few of Dan’s seminars. I would think as anyone grows, whether in the martial arts or in life, that they change their “way.” I am sure the way I taught my very first students and the way I have taught my most recent students would differ drastically. It would not surprise me if others would ridicule me for teaching a certain way. I would think Dan’s “path” is, and continues to be, what he feels fits the moment.

What is your take on Inosanto's three certificates being signed on the same day?
MH: I am unfamiliar with the three certificates. However, it is not uncommon for a student to be certified with many sashes at one time. For instance, I recall one student taking only one certification test, his Black Sash test and passing. This gave him multiple certificates one the same day which included his Blue Sash, Green Sash, Brown Sash, and Black Sash.

How often do you teach and how many students do you have?
MH: At the moment I teach my kids privately in my garage. I teach mostly Ju-Jitsu and the concepts to them, but they seem to enjoy it.

What do you look for in prospective students?
MH: The hunger to learn. Not necessarily martial arts, but the openness to learn about themselves and how they can improve themselves.

Have you ever had to use Wu Wei in real life encounters and if so, how effective was the art?
MH: I attempt to use the concept of wu-wei daily although the application of the concept often eludes me. As far as fighting goes, “Fighting without fighting” has served me well, but I did have one altercation with a former student of Wu-Wei (not my student) that ended up in a fight. I cannot explain what happened during the fight because I honestly do not know what happened. All I know is I had blacked out and when I came to the guy was on the ground. I was standing with his leg in a leg lock and I was ready to twist the heck out of it when I realized that is something I didn’t want to do since he was a former student. Was my blacking out an application of Wu-Wei? Could the blacking out be referred to as the “it” I remember Bruce once mentioning?

Who do you respect in JKD in regards to second-generation instructors?
MH: I respect all second-generation instructors because I respect and trust all of Bruce Lee’s direct descendants.

What are your goals in your training and teaching of Wu Wei?
MH: Right now my training and teaching of Wu-Wei is very limited. This is by choice after teaching some 16 years at the University of Texas at Arlington. I do try to maintain a Wu-Wei website to help with communication between instructors, students, and prospective students. Perhaps things may change and I will teach formally again.

What differences do you see in the art of Wu Wei and Lee's final evolution of Jeet Kune Do?
MH: The two are basically the same. That is, since Wu-Wei and Jeet Kune Do both come from the same root, they have the same foundation. They both deal with the exploration of oneself. Some instructors excel in one aspect of martial arts and even others excel in the philosophy of the art. Hopefully, the “final” evolution of Jeet Kune Do has not arrived. As the “Tao of Jeet Kune Do” says, “Jeet Kune Do is not a matter of technology, but of spiritual insight and training.” Or as Joseph Cowles related to us about Bruce saying something to the effect, “You never stop learning until they the put the last nail in your coffin.”

Where do you see Wu Wei in the future?
MH: The future of the art has been turned over to Eyal Koren and Joe Purcell. I am not sure at this time what each sees as the future of Wu-Wei.

How often do you speak to Joe Cowles and do you have any plans to update your training with him in person?
MH: I have only spoken with Sifu Cowles a few times over the past year. Before that we would talk maybe once a month when I was heavily involved in creating a book on Wu-Wei, the development of a Wu-Wei website, and even before that, a Wu-Wei newsletter. I have always wanted to visit Sifu especially when he was living in Idaho, but family matters have always taken priority. Perhaps someday I can visit Sifu in Washington.